A new example of someone engaging into the popular game of denigrating solar energy:
https://thehonestsorcerer.medium.com/the-future-of-electricity-d227eac74ba8
Fortunately, this post does not appear on a peer reviewed journal, but this type of paper is becoming the run-of-the-mill of the discussion. It contains classical statements such as:
"Energy captured and transformed by solar and wind cannot be compared to coal or natural gas used in power plants:"
Why that? Well, because,
"1. As mentioned above these sources can de-stabilize the grid’s voltage and frequency, and thus need to be balanced with either gas fired power plants or batteries
2. Weather dependent energy is available half of the time at best, so you need double, triple the nameplate capacity to make sure you have enough"
and therefore
"solar and wind are mere additions to an ever growing fossil fuel platform. " and "we
can safely say, that a nationwide stable electric grid (which is
available on demand 24/7, just like today) is practically impossible to
build based on renewables and battery power alone, or at least be
maintained without the massive aid provided by fossil fuels.
And more of the same: no quantification, no calculation, no justification. The references are carefully chosen only among those that support the author's viewpoint. The many studies that prove that renewable energy does not need the support of fossil fuels are ignored. It is like that because it has to be like that. Typical.
The author signs his blog as "The Honest Sorcerer." There is no
evidence that he is a scientist and, as I said, this is not a peer
reviewed paper. The problem is that the public and decision-makers,
alike, read this kind of papers. I know plenty of smart people, even
scientists, who have completely swallowed this nonsense. And the more
people believe in this assessment of renewable energy, the more the
assessment spreads over the media.
The results can be tragic. In Italy, we have a large wind plant ready to be built, approved by all the agencies charged with approving it, and yet it cannot be built for the opposition of the cultural ministry of the Italian government.
We are facing a failure of the communication strategy of the renewable industry. In time, it may be that people will understand how things stand but, at present, we need a more proactive stance to fight this kind of disinformation. That doesn't mean that the Honest Sorcerer and the others should be silenced, not at all, but that we should state more openly, more often, and more clearly, that renewable energy CAN sustain a complex civilisation, and not just that: renewable energy is cheaper, more efficient, less polluting, and better than fossil fuels in all aspects. But it is true that it will never work if we continue believing that it can't.
